|
Our organization on the very large aspects of its development and venture program, works directly with the debt-equity private venture banking principals to arrange the larger capital investments required for massive expansion to occur of what is already seen implemented by our organization; using their own privately held collateral and money, any equity that is required and they (as a group of private enterprise banking organizations in a consortium that our organization has organized), work with any given one of the nations premier senior debt providers that we may so deem appropriate for any given one or more of our platforms to be expanded from. |
These private banking pools within the scope of the M3-ARP (Aggregated Resource Pools) has unlimited access to any amount of money they require on their end of any negotiation for any venture that is adeptly completed to the point of this level of engagement (primary banking for primary expansion) in a ‘debt-equity’ – joint venture hybrid structure.
|
We as a principal group are in constant communication with the decision maker and check writer. The principal banking parties do act quickly if they like the deal. These ventures at that level are the combination of a completed deliverable on the part of our platform that contains all of the elements required to engage and complete a sizeable capital transaction across the substrate of the development platform being expanded.
|
|
Primary M3-ARP banking participation is quite simple: The privately held banks (registered bankers and their extended, United States based, premier senior debt providers put up the money required by the ‘client project-object development module’; in order to complete the project. The firm that does this ‘debt-equity’ position takes an equity or ownership position in exchange for funding the entire project or their ‘end’ of the project. The investment firm chosen charges no interest, no points and no pre closing fees. |
The ‘client-project-object-module’ must pay, of course, each within their own pre closing costs: example, third party studies. Each “project-object-module’ must be properly documented and presented by our firm in its work with the debt-equity-bankers chosen. A sight visit is expected and perhaps a visit to the debt-equity (private bankers) offices in the metropolitan arena of their choice within the scope of their organizations’ point of business. They make decisions and close quickly but they will not work under “client-project-object-modules’ imposed deadlines. They require those of us who are incubating the “project-object-modules”, to do all diligence and present documents in a complete and specific manner. We therefore, work with the private bankers and their affiliates representatives, (bonafide represenatives of principal bankers or the bankers themselves directly), and take the principal of any given “Project-object-module”, direct to the closing table. |
 |
Starting with a summary for our review, on each for instance “Project-object-module” that we are developing, is the question; what is of interest to the president of the bank? What is the model of the project and the integrity and ability of the principal? The first meeting is most always very informal, an old world style, get to know each other meeting. The banks are only interested in projects that will lead to continued funding requirements by the principal and developer. |
The banks want to exit within usually two years. Prime example of how the bank works is as follows: Someone brings the bank a developer who wishes to do an entertainment theme park on the west coast. The developer owns the land and needs 25 M more for construction, equipment and so forth. The bank president carefully reviews the model and suggests the following: |
The park when done would net approx 1.8 M in profit in year three. Nice numbers but little or no interest to the bank. The banker suggests that they set aside 4 acres, or buy another 4 acres and they (the bank) would want the developer to build a hotel (Guaranteed Income Contract or (Banks GIC), using the banks model. |
|
